Editor’s Note: Identifying key digital evidence is only half the battle—ensuring that evidence is admissible in court is what ultimately matters. This article examines the legal standards that govern ...

A “deepfake” objection backed by nothing more than the word itself will get a litigant nowhere in most federal courtrooms, ...

Recognizing the legal system's growing vulnerability to manipulated digital content, the U.S. Judicial Conference’s Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules has advanced a groundbreaking proposal: a new ...

How did a deepfake indict an innocent person in federal court without anyone catching it? The first federal survey of judges ...

Jonathan D. Uslaner and Matthew Goldstein of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP examine the proposed new Federal Rule of Evidence 707, which addresses the admissibility of machine-generated ...

At a meeting Thursday, the U.S. court system’s advisory committee on evidence rules declined to advance a proposed amendment aimed at preventing AI-generated deepfakes from being admitted at trial.

An expert Q&A on proposed Rule 707 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) and key issues when handling AI-generated evidence and AI-enhanced evidence in federal court. Judge Grimm is the David F. Levi ...